tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5294547523454259081.post1364058650958361434..comments2023-12-13T23:36:17.126-05:00Comments on Philosophy, lit, etc.: Joad and Stebbingpraymonthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09799593980838361293noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5294547523454259081.post-24748022191008894102012-09-03T00:57:12.343-04:002012-09-03T00:57:12.343-04:00Yes, thanks Richard. I'm reluctant to complain...Yes, thanks Richard. I'm reluctant to complain about the SEP, since it's such a valuable resource that was launched and maintained by volunteers; but there are some gaps in their projected contents. I'm not sure if their mission is to cover only original philosophers or also to include great philosophical educators. So, e.g., while critics say that Radhakrishnan wasn't very original, I think he warrants an entry in the SEP due to his efforts in helping the English-speaking world to develop an appreciation for eastern philosophy. I should note that Radhakrishnan cites Joad's <i>Present and Future of Relgion</i> in <i>An Idealist View of Life</i>.praymonthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09799593980838361293noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5294547523454259081.post-82276448545374065852012-09-02T16:22:35.764-04:002012-09-02T16:22:35.764-04:00Thank you for such thorough research.
Just a smal...Thank you for such thorough research.<br /><br />Just a small point :<br /><br />Neither Stebbing OR Joad appeared in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (SEP) :<br /><br />http://plato.stanford.edu/contents-unabridged.htmlRichard W. Symondshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14888685360169769251noreply@blogger.com